Don Syme
Don Syme
@abelbraaksma Should we close this old one out?
@Xyncgas I left some initial comments - we'd need tests too. Any reason this doesn't go direct into the main library?
@abelbraaksma Should we close this old one out?
@Xyncgas Seems reasonable!
Yes, IIRC this is an F# language limitation where it is problematic to express that a method takes a single parameter of type `unit`, rather than no parameters. It's almost...
Hi @maxx We wouldn't change Return to Zero - that would be a breaking change. We might however remove the limitation that Return gets called with both `()` (zero) and...
That approach looks good! Please add an fslang.uservoice.com entry for it - I'll mark it as approved for some future release - and submit the PR to Microsoft/visualfsharp. It will...
So if I understand correctly we should just remove the `Return` from the builder in this repo (and accept the breaking change if people are using `return` explicitly in `asyncSeq`)
@natalie-o-perret Looks good, please consider making a PR, thanks
We will be making a new version of this library that implements the official task-producing IAsyncEnumerable. Indeed I'll be working on that now