David Solt

I agree that a PMIX_MIN_PROCS option would be sufficient to support MPI_COMM_SPAWN with a soft spawn and also allow for other uses.

Please use emoji reactions ON THIS COMMENT to indicate your position on this proposal. * You do not need to vote on every proposal * If you have no opinion,...

Outstanding issues not addressed yet in the PR: - Use of calloc/free in macros and in PMIx_data_load, No means to free the data allocated by PMIx_Data_compress and decompress - “These...

Please use emoji reactions ON THIS COMMENT to indicate your position on this proposal. * You do not need to vote on every proposal * If you have no opinion,...

Please use emoji reactions ON THIS COMMENT to indicate your position on this proposal. * You do not need to vote on every proposal * If you have no opinion,...

Our working group is working on fixes to improve the process management chapter. (there is a PR open currently). As of now we do not have any textual changes around...

Please use emoji reactions ON THIS COMMENT to indicate your position on this proposal. You do not need to vote on every proposal If you have no opinion, don't vote...

Here is the latest draft with the changes from the first reading (i.e. introduce a PMIx_Publish2, get rid of PMIX_DATA_TO_PUBLISH, and specify that the range of lookup is used to...

List of items to deal with: - Define PMIX_PUBLISH_IDLEN. - Do we want something like PMIX_PUBLISH_ID_ALL_MINE (like PMIX_PUBLISH_ID_ALL, but only for caller) - Create API to translate a publish-id to...

I added a new commit for: * lookup blocking and non-blocking are so different. Should we separate keys from return values in the blocking call so it looks more like...