Daniel Alley
Daniel Alley
> So dependency solving seems to be correct, but throwing uploaded content into the mix throws it off. That is... weird. Very weird. There's nothing about dependency solving that would...
Submitting a PR to fix by skipping, will mark as [noissue] This issue will be for re-enabling the test
A few sticking points: * Generating the metadata requires inspecting the full RPMs, which aren't available during the first stage of the sync, and might not be downloaded at all...
@daviddavis Basically the package has a few different components: * Headers, with a key-value-store kind of thing that stores metadata about the package * An archive containing the entire contents...
For package uploads, definitely. For synced packages, probably not without rearchitecting the entire way the sync pipeline works. The plugin has already handed off control by the time the artifacts...
It's been a while since I looked at appstream. I don't know if this would be useful or not, but theoretically speaking if we could strip down the metadata provided...
We have/had some upgrade tests in the pass, but they've been neglected for various reasons. We should have a discussion about whether it needs to be brought back in the...
@fao89 Do you know if this remains an issue?
> I'm inclined to leave these inconsistencies as they are (except for the wrong fixture) and only update related comments/docstrings (maybe linking this issue as justification). That's completely fair. This...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079946