Daniel Alley
Daniel Alley
Great writeup @pedro-psb, everything you've written sounds accurate One additional note is that if we're talking about S3, additional traffic isn't just an efficiency concern but does come with a...
I agree, architecturally speaking I can't really support doing signing outside of a worker. ------ Side note: we should do some at-scale upload performance testing at the rate of 100-or-so...
The main issue with adding this feature is that it's *suuuper* easy to accidentally misuse - you would basically need to ensure that only "leaf" packages that nothing else depends...
It would not however stop cold if you did an on-demand sync first, because that skips the package download process
We need to be 100% sure why this was there and that it is no longer necessary.
Thank you for the report! Closing https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/issues/2306 as a duplicate of this one (which has more info available). > We haven't considered the possibility of a repository having a .treeinfo...
Probably combine with https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/issues/2580
Should also include the database fields that go with https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/issues/3338 Due to zero-downtime policy we can't always clean up database fields in the same PRs that we remove features.
I'm fine with reassigning it to pulp_rpm. I agree that it probably isn't a CLI issue, at least.
Related: https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/issues/3173