Dr. Maxim Orlovsky
Dr. Maxim Orlovsky
@astral-bitlight is this PR is still actual and needed?
Extended in https://github.com/RGB-WG/rgb-std/pull/273/commits/f77e76f7584eb997d627b75e3ca4037467c21e3d with a fix for https://github.com/RGB-WG/rgb-std/issues/275
Thank you for the suggestion! First, he needs to accept invitation to the org
Blank state transitions are not related to any specific interface, since they use a reserved transition type, which can't be used by any of the interfaces. So it actually doesn't...
Ok, I see that `blank_transition` returns the same `TransitionBuilder`, just pre-set with a proper transition type. So, to remove iface argument we need to implement a new `BlankBuilder` struct. Since...
There is no more old interfaces nor blank state transitions (since v0.11.1 and v0.12)
The PR makes sense for me. @zoedberg @crisdut can you confirm the same so we can merge it before the next release?
Not anymore applicable in the context of the new architecture
Yes, extension builder will be needed. Extension doesn't close any single-use seals though; its inputs are redeems. Redeems do redeem valencies, defined by other operations; it is the way how...
There is no more state extensions (since v0.11.1 and v0.12)