Dr. Maxim Orlovsky
Dr. Maxim Orlovsky
@jb55 I proposed a binary encoding some time ago with #512, but we came to conclusion that it is better to experiment with it in a dedicated protocol. That's why...
I think this is highly required - but it is better to wait for v0.10 since otherwise all these test vectors would be broken
Yes, let's skip the check altogether then. Also, in v0.12 there is no such thing anyway
Why did you close the PR? It was fine, you've could just add a commit removing the check on top...
> i have tried to fix it, but the deprecated strict_serialize_type i can't fix. because that need to modify the upstream strict_types Sorry, I do not get why/where you need...
Closing as it is no more actual with the new v0.12 wallet
Released as v0.12.0-beta.4
Many reasons: 1. I can't work with git submodules. It kills my time and productivity. So approach in `rgb-tests` is non-working for me 2. I do not know that code...
Not anymore actual; tests continue to be developed in `rgb-tests` repo
We have added `AssetTag` because we had Confidential assets, which require its presence (as was explained to me by Adam Back in Oct 2023). A side-effect of that was ability...