Damien Mathieu

Hi, I removed insecure, as it's usually a pretty bad habit to use it, and getting certificates, even for development environments is quite easy these days. I'm not opposed to...

I think it still may make sense. `apm-server` does support OTLP. So as long as we document that services can only communicate with recent apm-servers (7.14 and higher it seems),...

It seems like the `var-naming` check from `revive` may be the one which does this? It appears to be enabled though. I've tried tweaking its configuration, to no success though.

I'm happy to do it, but it'll have to wait for a few days. I can then do it either in this PR, or in a new one.

Could that be related to a cache file already existing? (in which case, the issue could be that in the case of running tests with an existing cache, the file...

I'm not sure whether there's still something missing in this PR?

Even though this isn't a public plugin, changing it's behavior is going to break some people's flow. So I think we need to make that an option.

A complete example would be a simple `main.go` that reproduces the issue.

This will need a changelog entry.

Doing this would be a breaking change. We can't do that without a v2 of the API (which also probably shouldn't happen without a v2 of the specification). For the...