Dirkjan Ochtman
Dirkjan Ochtman
Do you also have a PR out for libc? We generally prefer to keep these temporary.
> I agree with @tarcieri and @traviscross that we can and should talk about both TUF and TLs (whether Sigstore, BT, etc), especially with a threat model, the different problems...
> @djc re: jargon/etc. I think this would be valuable. Is this something where patches are welcome? I'm not very familiar with the rust RFC process, but I'd be happy...
This is more due to the underlying profiling backend (`perf` if you're on Linux), not flamegraph itself. You might be able to increase the profiling frequency to capture a larger...
Happy to review a PR.
@cachebag suggest submitting a (draft) PR so we can look at the code a bit.
I thought we fixed this in #4533. Maybe that didn't deploy correctly or there's more we need to do for deployment? Or maybe this is a related but slightly different...
Hmm, maybe we should decouple that to get more continuous deployment of the website...
Right, I remember we discussed with @rbtcollins whether there was value in the OpenTelemetry support and he argued that it was very helpful for him the few times he needed...
@aspect @surinder83singh can you talk about the maintenance status of the workflow-core crate? If it's unmaintained, it would be good to communicate this.