Diego Frata

That's interesting and definitely could be added for floating number types!

Could probably call it **PrecisionEquality**

Version 2.2.0 now supports the attribute CustomEquality, which can be used to bridge any specific case not built into the library, including comparing doubles. I will leave this issue open...

Keep the checkbox. I don't want to have to scroll all the way down to re-enable follow tail.

Might be, but only IF you know about it. I didn't. On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 at 21:09, Drew Noakes [email protected] wrote: > @diegofrata https://github.com/diegofrata easier to just press End....

I don't see much gain in removing the runtime dependency only for cases without custom comparers, to me this is either all or nothing -- either we move all comparers...

Happy to have this included, but could you add test cases for this feature?

Yeah, I would definitely accept a PR for that if it doesn't make the code-generation any more unreadable than it already is.

I am happy with the formatting in your example. Happy for you to submit it in a different PR! One small thing so that I can merge this PR: can...

Yes, although I can't think of a scenario where I would ever use it. Out of curiosity, how would you use it?