Diego Ferigo
Diego Ferigo
Ok, it makes sense. I think these information could be useful both for people coming here and for whom will address this issue. Thanks again!
Adding more details, the only issue still present with Gazebo 8 is the following: ``` [ERROR]An hardware fault occurred on joint 2 torque too big! ``` But on this version,...
Can you try loading the sdf model without hands? @anqingd
I found this tutorial about the differences between SDF and URDF frames specifications quite interesting: https://bitbucket.org/osrf/sdf_tutorials/src/default/pose_frame_semantics/tutorial.md
I'm confused, would it be different than https://github.com/robotology/icub-models#from-the-source-repo? Edit: ow, now I got the right anchor to the README. Yes it is missing.
I want to bump this issue since it is affecting all our simulations. Is there available any (even unofficial) list of recently identified friction parameters? I don't think that these...
While having a one-size-fits-all model would be a great achievement, from our experience we realized that is hardly possible. We could maybe remove the duality between `iCubGazeboV2_5` and `iCubCityNameXXX` with...
> The point of the issue is to make sure that any modification for use with Gazebo or any simulator that we "officially" support in the future should be done...
Maybe [Proposal for parameter passing](http://sdformat.org/tutorials?tut=param_passing_proposal&cat=pose_semantics_docs&) can be a powerful solution. It seems based on SDFormat 1.7, therefore also Gazebo Classic 11 (https://github.com/robotology/icub-models/issues/77) should be supported. Edit: maybe not, at the...
> > Edit: maybe not, at the time of writing Gazebo Classic 11 [uses sdformat9](https://github.com/ignition-tooling/gazebodistro/blob/acf699453a8bf69b30c83c8a80241bc75017f09e/gazebo11.yaml#L30-L33) and the proposal targets sdformat10. It's not remote the possibility that the supported sdformat version...