Daniel Howe
Daniel Howe
good notice -- I wonder if we might be able to remove all the 'vbn' from the dictionary, since we can compute them from the base form
So we have done this before with verb tenses (see earlier tickets from @[cqx931](https://github.com/cqx931) below). Once we find a pos that we want to remove from the dict, then we...
This looks really good -- I think the ultimate goal is to _only_ have 'vb' for each of the regular verbs (plus all needed forms for irregular verbs) and compute...
great -- also needs to handle: ```js RiTa.analyze('concerned') RiTa.analyze('concerns') ```
@KarlieZhao status ?
good - this will take some thought, so first come up with a plan... then we can discuss
this makes sense, but perhaps these words should also be in the lexicon
and yes, `f-eh-d` is correct
@KarlieZhao when you are working again, please remind me of the status of this...
Not quite - tokenization needs to be consistent. That is, the tokenizer and the analyzer need to stay in sync -- we don't want the tokenizer returning one set of...