dgw

Could probably add a background-image and margin to fit it in using CSS, embedding the image itself as base64-encoded SVG in the stylesheet. Surely there's a free-licensed icon library one...

I expect the same behavior as @wodim

ACKing `userhost-in-names` but omitting the hostmask from some entries in the replies looks like a pretty clear spec violation. [The spec](https://ircv3.net/specs/extensions/userhost-in-names) says "the full hostmask (nick!user@host) of every user listed"....

@Exirel Since this can't be fixed in Python 2, let's push this to the 8.0.0 milestone? The draft migration guide I have for Sopel 7 explicitly says we'll drop all...

@HumorBaby @Exirel Do we need to do anything about this, or is it fixed automatically by dropping support for py2 in #2062?

Roadmap TBD, but not rejected. Several users (myself included) keep running into cases where this would be useful, but no one wants to just hack in a half-assed solution.

I have updated the OP with more details because "What it says on the tin" was absolutely _not_ clear to me after 9 months. But I really don't think this...

Even "someone more in tune with the IRC protocol" can't do anything about this without raw logs of what's happening between Sopel and the IRC server.

I think EFNet is one of very few networks that lock channels during a netsplit. Most IRCds (AFAIK) just let users on the lost segment join channels anyway and resolve...

Handling numeric 437 (`ERR_UNAVAILRESOURCE`) shouldn't be too difficult, as it does include the nick/channel that was unavailable (so there's no need for Sopel to do a lot of complicated state...