David Gault

Thanks Curtis for opening the PR. You are correct, marking the dependency is the correct solution as the library shouldn't impose the binding on downstream consumers. The only remaining instances...

Moving this PR to the 6.12.0 milestone to give more time to test downstream applications

Hi @arvequina, thank you for contributing this PR to the project. We have introduced a Contributor License Agreement, would you be able to sign and return the form following the...

Also regarding the UnsatisfiedLinkError, I see that there are 3 closed sourced binaries included in the PR. These are not something that we can include directly in Bio-Formats. Our suggestion...

Im afraid embedding closed sourced binaries is just not something that will be possible. In the past we have had both codecs such as LuraWaveCodec or format readers which are...

Quite a few failures in the repo tests due to adding the units to the physical size, most of this are likely correct updates but some such as `Length: value[0.054921],...

Merge CI is now green without the unit changes. Getting this merged for 6.11.0 and we can follow up on the units addition for the next release

Hi @XLEFReaderForBioformats, Im reviewing the release milestones for the coming weeks and months and though I would follow up. Do you think it is likely to expect an update that...

Thats no problem, we don't have a release timetable for 6.12.0 as of yet and have some flexibility around the schedule, I suspect it would likely be early in the...

A number of repo files have been impacted by this and will need further investigation to confirm if the new pixel values are correct: https://merge-ci.openmicroscopy.org/jenkins/job/BIOFORMATS-test-folder/62923/consolee