Patrik Ragnarsson

How to reproduce / debug * TruffleRuby: `docker run --rm -it -v $(pwd):/app -w /app ghcr.io/graalvm/truffleruby-community:23.1.2-debian bash` * CRuby: `docker run --rm -it -v $(pwd):/app -w /app ruby:3.2.3 bash` *...

> sometimes the first `ch.basic_publish` is not blocked, I guess that why the test case has two of them Regarding this, I just saw this comment at probably explains it...

These tests https://github.com/cloudamqp/amqp-client.rb/blob/5c05f61f7f466c3e1cc05746c25cb5c8f40ca10a/.github/workflows/main.yml#L89-L92 now times out with truffleruby 24.0.0 ([logs](https://github.com/cloudamqp/amqp-client.rb/actions/runs/8433500269/job/23094690309#step:12:22)) truffleruby 23.1.2 was passing ([logs](https://github.com/cloudamqp/amqp-client.rb/actions/runs/8298455649/job/22711859803#step:12:22))

Yes, it is possible to create instances on LavinMQ plans with the API. Feel free to contribute a PR!

Docs: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/hashicorp/[email protected]/helper/customdiff

I'm not sure I follow... what is that migration? What will using SDK v2 bring us? Besides using something newer which is almost always better because I guess SDK v1...

> What will using SDK v2 bring us? Oh, just saw https://github.com/cloudamqp/terraform-provider-cloudamqp/issues/214#issuecomment-1661826114

How does it matter to the end-user if we use SDK v1, SDK v2 or Plugin Framework? Has the Terraform state format changed between them? So if we make a...

I'm hesitant to add this because I'm not sure it will properly address the issue due to negative caching: https://serverfault.com/questions/426807/how-long-does-negative-dns-caching-typically-last The CloudAMQP backend powering the API might cache the NXDOMAIN...

We have many resources (https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Acloudamqp%2Fterraform-provider-cloudamqp%20retries&type=code) having `sleep` and `timeout` https://github.com/cloudamqp/terraform-provider-cloudamqp/blob/ed76481c0b7b614cceb3a0a73f103855f10e9e37/cloudamqp/resource_cloudamqp_rabbitmq_configuration.go#L142-L153 So sure, the `cloudamqp_custom_domain` could have that too