Denis Maier
Denis Maier
Shall we add a "Zotero" label here as the CSL part is dealt with in a different issue?
Zotero not CSL, right?
If it's easy enough I guess this should be covered in CSL 1.1.
Sorry, but is this a CSL issue or a Zotero issue? Can't we just use `volume` with every item type?
Again is this Zotero or CSL?
So, perhaps we should use a "Zotero" label here?
Oh, that's interesting. Pandoc's citeproc renders both `layout` nodes? Am I reading this correctly?
What about also checking the version attribute on cs:style? On regular CSL 1.0 mode this should raise an error. Yet, perhaps someone might add more features in additional mode.
Well, then it's clearly against the specification...
> 2\. Is it impossible that citeproc supports multiple layouts by parsing if-statements that are originally implemented in CSL 1.0 and independent of CSL-m? For example, would citepric conditionally display...