Denis Maier

> Can you not add labels and such Denis? I thought I gave you same rights as Brenton. I can add them in schema, evolution and documentation (I think). But...

> > I don't think I've ever seen the printing of a book cited in a bibliography. > > https://www.ntvg.nl/system/files/publications/1992114800001a.pdf (https://www.ntvg.nl/artikelen/abc-nutrition-0/volledig) mentions the printing in a book review (it's a...

> It's my understanding that printings can differ significantly, especially in literature. E.g. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uitgeefgeschiedenis_van_Max_Havelaar discusses the differences/history behind all the various printings of one of the most famous classic Dutch...

Yes, I think so. I don't think it will do much harm.

If we add this, this should indeed be also added for the item types @zuphilip mentioned. However, I am a bit inclined to support @njbart's view expressed [here](https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/issues/111#issuecomment-78018795). Seems a...

Oh but yeah, CSL-M already has `Volume title`, and (interestingly) [pandoc-citeproc also supports `volume title` already](https://github.com/jgm/pandoc-citeproc/blob/f29492577a5242eb31f17a65869e42ac53a50946/src/Text/CSL/Reference.hs#L440).

What shall we do about this? The general idea was accepted, right? If yes, let's move it to accepted. Concerning implementation: What about @njbart's proposal? I still think that would...

Ok, to sum up: We need a way to properly cite multivolume works. That seems to be a general consensus. The other question is if we introduce `volume-title` or `collective-title`,...

Can we close this, or remove it from this board? The feature seems to be there already in CSL as @bwiernik points out. So this should probably be discussed somewhere...

So, let's just take this from this discussion board, or move it to rejected. And perhaps we can add an appropriate label? (That way, the issue will still be open...