Denis Maier

Question is if this falls within the scope of CSL proper. While it is possible to support these things in a batch workflow (i.e., with org or pandoc), I don't...

> I'm in a field that is predominantly author-date, and occasionally note. > > So not surprisingly, I'm going to prefer the former. To be clear, as far as aestetics...

> When changing between a parenthetical and a note style, there's an extra step. Besides changing styles, the user has to explicitly operate a plugin functionality that switches reference positions....

> Is it really that much closer connected? They surely concentrate much more on Word, not offering any other direct integration, but technically, I’m not sure, as they are now...

> Can you give an example of what pandoc or citeproc-org do? In pandoc you write your citations like this: > Bla Bla [@doe2020]. Or: > "Bla Bla" [@doe2020]. Now,...

Maybe we should recommend atom instead of emacs?

Well, now that we are discussing a CSL API we could perhaps consider the feature request in that context. Like, calling applications should be able to request multiple bibliographies with...

Coming back to an [earlier issue concerning this topic](https://github.com/Juris-M/citeproc-js/issues/104), and re-reading @fbennett's response, I realize that citeproc-js is apparently already able to do this ([citeproc-js manual](https://citeproc-js.readthedocs.io/en/latest/running.html#selective-output-with-makebibliography)). (Frank has also described...

I think I've seen requirements like: only use ibid. if the preceding citation is in a citation only note, and if it wasn't part of a group of multiple citations.

> I've seen requirements like that. My vote would be to state that `position="ibid"` and `position="ibid-with-locator"` never apply when a citation contains more than one item or when the citation...