Maksim Stepanov
Maksim Stepanov
Hi, @kumarkrish85 I know, It's old, but still. The `allure-cmd` package hides `allure` module from `allure-python-commons`. If you uninstall it with `pip uninstall allure-cmd` everything will run smoothly.
I'm closing this as resolved. Please, let me know if the issue still remains.
Hello, @yannay000 ! This is a well-known issue in Allure TestOps: - if you assign an id dynamically in the body of a test function AND - if the full...
Duplicate of #341 You can use the following workaround without the need to add an id as a parameter: ```python import allure import pytest @pytest.mark.parametrize("v", ["Value 1", "Value 2"], ids=["key-1",...
Hi, @fishasen ! Docs for allure_commons are in the plan. Can't estimate a date yet, but you can refer to existing integrations in this repo (pytest, behave, etc) or ask...
The link to the screenshot here is just a part of appium log. I don't think it's wise to try to parse and post-process html logs - they are just...
Fixed in #453 Released in [2.8.7](https://github.com/allure-framework/allure-python/releases/tag/2.8.7)
Hi! This is not a bug report of a feature request. It's better to ask such questions on https://stackoverflow.com/ I'm closing it now because it is old and doesn't seem...
Allure decorators like `@allure.story` and `allure.dynamic` are not yet implemented in allure-pytest-bdd. Only `allure.attach` and `allure.attach.file` calls are supported.
Duplicate of #726 Merged multiple related issues into a single one.