David Yahalomi
David Yahalomi
Hey @aullman! Thanks for reaching out. I think sending retained information should be handled with GraphQL queries rather than using something like graphql-subscriptions... Could you elaborate more on your use...
Hey @wtrocki! I would actually love to merge PRs with fixes for the current issues. As far as I can see, this repo is quite far ahead so it would...
I think that in the long run, option 3 is preferred of course. My current projects do not use mqtt unfortunately so any work on my end is spare time...
Hey @tjmehta, Thanks for the PR! I'd love to merge this but can you fix the failing tests? Thanks ahead!
Hey @ajmerik121, would you mind sharing a reproduction repo? Have you tried doing the same code with the local PubSubEngine provided on the graphql-subscription package?
Hey @rohit-gohri Thanks for the contribution! I wouldn't mind merging that but please make sure that CI is passing. At the moment it seems like that typescript compile is breaking.
Also, if you don't mind, please add a section to the README that demonstrates how this can be used for TS users.
Hey @skabbes Thanks for this issue and sorry I failed to maintain this package for quite a while. So if I understand correctly, your use case can be generalized as...
The reason I don't particularly love option 1 is because `asyncIterator` is more of a data structure rather than a function. I do agree with your take where you might...
Hey @Zony-Zhao @otroboe Does this issue belong here? Would you suggest any change to this package? Thanks ahead