davidschlegel

I would also be very happy to hear some news about this feature, as I think it is very crucial for low energy setups.

Any progress on implementing multithreading on the latest julia version?

Any update on a possible fix?

Okay, so actually, I found the solution myself. One can define a function for the `metadata` of the type `ComplexTerm` by just taking the metadata of real or imaginary parts...

I encountered the same issue. Is there a fix?

Great, I"ll wait then until merged.

I think this is still not solved or is it? If I do ``` @variables α::Complex func = build_function(α', α; expression=false) ``` I get ``` func(1.0+1im) >>> real(α) - im*imag(α)...

I think the reason why it cannot work at the moment for complex input is that any `Complex{Num}` type gets wrapped into a `ComplexTerm` type, for which replacement rules are...

Yes, I agree, I feel like the `Complex{Num}` type creates a lot of problems, but I can see why the type exists. The best would be, if the complex type...