David Fowler
David Fowler
> For (2) the plan is to move to a world where you have full control over customization (via the C# type system). For (1), I think we are thinking...
@vhvb1989 and I have been discussing how to take over resources.bicep.
@DamianEdwards > What are next steps to make progress on this in preview.5? For your last strawman proposal @davidfowl are you thinking this model requires the user to reference Aspire.Hosting.Azure?...
If we bit the bullet and require a call in the app to add azure specific things (which I think we should just lean into at this point), then that...
I made some big strides with this change https://github.com/dotnet/aspire/pull/2965. The focus so far is modeling all of the resources in the manifest and stopping azd from generating resources.bicep (https://github.com/Azure/azure-dev/pull/3548). A...
Just FYI, we decided to punt this work to the first post GA release. There's enough going on that we will want to get our existing fundamentals right. With [my...
Linked issue is done in aspire https://github.com/dotnet/aspire/pull/5470. The PR for azd is here https://github.com/Azure/azure-dev/pull/4286
Closing this out as https://github.com/Azure/azure-dev/pull/4286 was merged
We should file follow up issues about taking over container app environment customization.
If this API is VS code specific we should include VSCode in the name right?