dave-connors-3

the great @jtcohen6 spun up a working prototype over in #6902 for this packages.yml: ```yml packages: - package: dbt-labs/dbt_utils version: 1.0.0 # requires dbt-utils between 0.8.0 and 0.9.0 - package:...

@gofford i think the first option sounds right to me! the schemas currently in noted in the README are mostly there for backwards compatibility, and won't get updates, so we...

hey @simmartynas! are you willing to open a PR with this change? I think it's a good one!

million dollar matt! love this idea -- we rely on the `graph` variable for all the unpacking of project data, and I am not positive that hooks get written there....

I may have spoken too soon -- looks like we have uncompiled code in the node config! what kind of analysis do you anticipate wanting to do on the sql...

@matt-winkler @algarbar i spent some time on this today, and there are a couple caveats to what we have available that make me wonder if it's worth investing in! **1....

hey @deanmorin ! thanks for opening -- we can see if there's a straightforward way to skip commented lines. Can you help me understand why you might have `from` or...

hey @abupp ! thanks for the issue -- i think this would be a great enhancement. Can you think of a scenario where someone would _not_ want sorted columns? trying...

hey @waligob! nice to see you in a new repo :) can you confirm which schema version you're using?

hey @felipe-curebase ! are you still seeing this issue? I see we have a `file_format` key in each of our `dbt_project.yml` schemas currently! testing locally, the current schemas seem to...