Danny Jacobs
Danny Jacobs
I think just uvdata. Sorry didn’t think about labeling. On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 7:53 PM Bryna Hazelton wrote: > @dannyjacobs should this be labelled as > UVData related...
Should PR #211 have added support for the USB device port? We'd use it to connect to debug compute with USB over Ethernet or Mass Storage device. On the BBB...
The rest of the point source sims (with the exception of zenith for some reason) are tested to 1e-8. Can you get it that low with enough terms and still...
To which other models do you refer? All the point source tests test to the default allclose atol of 1e-8 except for the original "pt_src_zenith" which is at 5e-3 for...
Oh, I think I see. The test iterates through the various models https://github.com/RadioAstronomySoftwareGroup/pyuvsim/blob/9179bad3573856cefc03b7adfc9e5e23e8b54520/pyuvsim/tests/test_run.py#L68 If you set https://github.com/RadioAstronomySoftwareGroup/pyuvsim/blob/9179bad3573856cefc03b7adfc9e5e23e8b54520/pyuvsim/tests/test_run.py#L85 to 50, all tests pass at 1e-4. The other functional forms, cosza, don't...
According to the updated analysis, the residuals no longer diverge under any tested resolution. 
Yes, but here we're talking about a clear statement in the README and on ReadTheDocs that we're testing against analytic calculations to provide a basis for validating other simulators.
Yeah, this was done as a crash effort to help with our first XSEDE computing proposal (which was successful) and maybe to answer JOSS reviewer questions? I don't think it...