Daniel Marjamäki
Daniel Marjamäki
> See https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck/pull/7768#issuecomment-3290533566 for a case where this found a subtle bug I would have introduced. I fear that there is a lot of flux in the cppcheck repo and...
> I wanted to maintain this externally but that will most certainly bitrot if it is not tied to the build. that sounds somewhat interesting imho. I am not sure...
I fear this will not be a practical test for us. * I don't like huge golden file tests. My experience with golden files is that we will not care...
thanks for working on this. :+1:
> Even without my change test-my-pr.py fails for me: I am confused I have run that script now and then. Ludvig executed it last week on the branch where he...
> If one of you is able to run it with the changes I think it would be fine to merge. I ran test-my-pr on 4-5 packages and don't see...
> This way it documents what to do and could be easily run without much copy and paste. Documentating the release process etc is valuable. However plain text is less...
@Tal500 Please simplify this issue description. Please just show relevant `gcc -E` output.
I don't know.. this might be related to #397
> I updated this issue now to contain simpler reproduction. Excellent :+1: