Daniel Huppmann
Daniel Huppmann
Keep the PRs clean and simple, so I suggest to merge #419. Not sure how soon we can move forward with the next steps.
Two comments: from my basic intuition as an IAM modeler, adding fossil-fuel as a subcategory of energy-supply is not very intuitive. And if this is going to be a variable...
For my understanding, what's the rationale? Because int-values can't be saved to a database?
This issue is now becoming relevant again because **ixmp4** can handle inf-values when writing directly to the database but this causes issues with the API (and downstream services like visualizations...
Good question - any thoughts @IAMconsortium/common-definitions-emissions?
For cross-reference of tool-development and use case: https://github.com/IAMconsortium/nomenclature/issues/427
@dc-almeida and I are working on nomenclature improvements to have more flexibility, one of those is https://github.com/IAMconsortium/nomenclature/issues/416. @jkikstra, could you please let us know which combinations should be removed from...
In the meantime, teams can just exclude irrelevant combinations from their reporting, no need to put millions of zeros in their output spreadsheets.
CDR under the Emissions|CO2|* : is it clear enough where to report removals from different methods ?
> The description on Emissions|CO2|AFOLU, which is "Emissions of fossil carbon dioxide (CO2) from agriculture, forestry and other land use (IPCC category 3)", is a bit confusing since it is...
Thanks @phackstock > The release notes entry seems to be missing for now Added > An entry to the docs page about firstly the datetime upload option and the datetime...