Daniel Prilik

@jakab922, any updates here? I'll leave this open a while longer, but if there's no movement here, I'll likely close this as unactionable 😅

> The thing is that the `Z` messages don't have any information on where one wants to set the breakpoint/watchpoint Is `addr` not precisely what you're interested in? > ‘z1,addr,kind’...

@jakab922, friendly ping :) Before implementing any changes, I want to make sure I've got a good grasp of the pain point / gap here.

No worries. The second approach of allowing users to hook into the 'H' packet via some sort of `MultiThreadBase::on_changed_resume_tid` method does indeed seem like a reasonable way to address this...

Looks reasonable to me! Before merging, I thought I might ask for a favor: any chance you could take a stab at updating the CI scripts to use that new...

Out of curiosity - is the idea of having a flowey-backed petri_artifact_resolver still something that's on folk's radar? This approach, where flowey drives nextest execution, has the unfortunate property of...

Sounds like the hybrid, multi-command approach of having a `test_artifact_manifest.json/toml` file would be a good balance then? i.e: a user workflow would look like: 1. attempt to run a test...

Hey, you know me - I've got no skin in the game here, just sharing my thoughts from afar :wink: The only other food-for-thought question I'll leave is wrt the...

Ahhh, you gotta love the GDB RSP, eh? Every time I think we've made a reasonable choice around representing some part of the protocol, there's always gotta be a feature...

Well shoot. That's unfortunate. I didn't realize the type was Copy... In that case, it seems we have no choice but to make a breaking change here. Bummer. I've gone...