Daniel Esik

It'd be awesome to get your thoughts about recent changes @bplommer @TobiasRoland.

Alright, I think we are good to save current progress. We had a quite deep discussion with many enthusiasts from the community. Thank you all! And, sure, special thanks to...

Also, rechunking after the `merge` (without any manipulation on the initial streams) allows using `parEvalMap` with the expected level of parallelism. https://scastie.scala-lang.org/Ocl100nAR42QZHambWDO0A It's worth to mention it works on 2.5.3...

I advise getting one more like before getting this merged.

Someone in this _thread_ suggested setting `headerLicense := None` but the code throwing the exception checks for non-emptiness 🤔 https://github.com/sbt/sbt-header/blob/master/src/main/scala/de/heikoseeberger/sbtheader/HeaderPlugin.scala#L145-L152 For anyone facing this issue, setting `organizationName`, `licenses` and `startYear`...

My two cents on the topic: `scalac-profiling` hugely relies on the `scala-reflect` library that is not ported to Scala 3. So we can't enable the support without porting exposing statistics...

Thanks for the quick answer! Hopefully, I will have time to delve into this in the upcoming weeks.

I've got some intuitions from @armanbilge (thanks Arman) that: 1. We can't add new methods to the standard library in 2.13.x series, because of binary compatibility constraints. 2. Even there...

w00t! 🔥 > Ember has now surpassed Blaze 🔥 On throughput but not latency, right? Also, has something changed to Ember's latency? cc @ChristopherDavenport Or maybe I'm just misreading the...

> the new implementation may be having a growing number of memory allocations for intermediate results Hmm, according to the benchmark, we get opposite results. The allocation rate is fewer...