dagger-for-github
dagger-for-github copied to clipboard
dagger
GitHub Action for Dagger
When configuring dagger to connect to an external engine (experimental) the action should not try to kill the engine container after running the CLI. It's not needed *and* will cause...
### What are you trying to do? _No response_ ### Why is this important to you? _No response_ ### How are you currently working around this? _No response_
### What are you trying to do? While playing with the new traces feature I noticed it's not particularly easy to get from a PR on GitHub to the relevant...
### What is the issue? Given the following config: https://github.com/lukemarsden/test-dagger-actions/blob/c0e90ddf436947e4c6639fd95e2c491095f87ff5/.github/workflows/docker-publish.yml In particular, ``` - name: Dagger Build & Push uses: dagger/dagger-for-github@v5 with: version: "0.11.0" verb: call args: | build-and-push \...
### What are you trying to do? In order to keep the Dagger version used in GitHub Actions the same as the engine version used, it would be nice to...
### What is the issue? The Show Dagger output prints nothing ``` jobs: hello-dagger: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: hello uses: dagger/[email protected] with: module: github.com/shykes/daggerverse/hello call: hello --greeting Hola --name...
### What happened? For example, is there any way to pass _DAGGER_ENGINE_SYSTEMENV_GOPROXY to the engine in the github runner? If not, any way to use a custom image?
### What are you trying to do? I want to utilize the `stdout` of the `dagger` call regardless of its exit code. I have pipelines that print data, then fail...
When trying to use this action I tried to provide multi-line args to my call command, for example: ```yaml - name: Run Something uses: dagger/dagger-for-github@v7 env: API_TOKEN: ${{ steps.set-token.outputs.api_token }}...
### What are you trying to do? A lot of feature requests would add complexity to the action that would be easier to express in TypeScript. Example: https://github.com/dagger/dagger-for-github/issues/110#issuecomment-1942142660 ### Why...