Lars Holmberg
Lars Holmberg
Yea I'm not sure what was really fixed either. I'll probably revert the PR, unless @sonianuj287 comes up with an improved version in the next few days.
Reverted in https://github.com/locustio/locust/pull/3255 As far as I can tell, the test case introduced there passes without the relevant changes so I don't think it actually fixed anything.
Love it! If you want to create a first implementation I would be happy to add a repo under locustio and have it be part of our official stuff. Regarding...
Real interesting! Couple of things: * Are you sure we want to use explicitly named parameters instead of just passing anything to locust? For the action to be as robust...
Also, instead of having settings for things like python-version etc, isn't it more robust if we ask users to use a standard python setup action (astral-sh/setup-uv@v2 or actions/setup-python@v6) first? I'm...
Cool stuff. Can you open a PR? Easier to reveiew diff, comment on it etc
Concurrent SSL context performance in python 3.12+ is very bad. Requests 2.32.2-2.32.4 had a fix for that but it was removed in .5 (https://github.com/psf/requests/pull/6767) We need to fix that first,...