Charles Tapley Hoyt

See https://github.com/openjournals/inara/pull/77, I think I've got a solution

yay! and, oh no! I think this is an artifact of how I turned the ROR SVG into the latex commands. This was a bit of oversight on my part...

hi @arfon, thanks for being patient. I hope I wasn't holding up the daily JOSS grind. I've got a fix in https://github.com/openjournals/inara/pull/90 :)

hi @arfon, we've merged the fix and made a new 1.1.2 release of Inara that includes it

Maybe there's still room for improvement on the vertical positioning and left padding, but this is looking much better already!

@allenbaron I also like this idea, thanks for the comment

great insight! related to the place you already commented in https://github.com/pykeen/pykeen/pull/1543 to decide how to do sampled evaluation

can we more generally engineer in some tests for compliance with Bioregistry (or a potential future monarch context in Bioregistry)?

I can prepare such a function. Are the QC checks for MONDO easy to add arbitrary python to?

I have high interest in seeing this enabled, so we can incorporate [obo-db-ingest](https://github.com/biopragmatics/obo-db-ingest) resources in the OLS! Further, I might want to try deploying my owl local OLS using gzipped...