Daniel McCarney
Daniel McCarney
> cla-check — CLA missing I'd like to think this meets the bar for a trivial change and have adjusted my commit message to include the trivial signifier line. I'd...
@t8m Your feedback has been applied. > There is a RETURN VALUES section where it should probably have a separate entry for this API, rather than grouping it with the...
> if the above issue is indeed at fault I think the best fix might be inside hyper, where we could ignore UnexpectedEof errors only for requests/responses that are deemed...
> this might still be an issue for HTTP 1 Ah, should we leave it open then?
The helper in #171 was merged and will be included in the next release, which should be published in the coming days.
Since the original poster hasn't replied with more detail I'm going to close this issue as unactionable for the time being. Thanks.
Based on @g2p's comment above I'm going to close this ticket as resolved. If the updated API doesn't meet the needs of the original poster we can re-open for further...
There isnt'! Would you be interested in providing one?
I think we've converged on supporting platform verifier behaviour from the crate that complexspaces linked above. I'm going to close this issue but if there's still interest in discussing whether...
Android and iOS are both supported by https://github.com/rustls/rustls-platform-verifier Is there user demand for a native-certs solution or should we suggest users consider using the platform verifier instead? That crate isn't...