Daniel McCarney
Daniel McCarney
> Specifically, this is a permission grant for ciphersuites, and “any of these bits are acceptable for permission grants” is how it should be read. @sleevi That makes sense to...
@robstradling Your interpretation here makes sense to me and I'm supportive of changing the lint logic to match. Thanks for filing the errata!
> I started to pull on this thread and I'm wondering if there's also something going on with our integration tests..... I think I figured out what's going on here,...
> Unfortunately I think it hid the true impact of this lint, making it seem like only 140 integration test certificates were linted to an error level by this lint....
I'll push a revert PR + a fix to the integration tests after dinner.
> I'll push a revert PR + a fix to the integration tests after dinner. Revert of the lint landed w/ https://github.com/zmap/zlint/pull/556 Integration test overflow fix: https://github.com/zmap/zlint/pull/557
@ZsofiaTomicsko Echoing @robstradling - definitely no need to apologize :-) The RFC text is unclear, it was missed in review, and our integration tests fell down on the job. We...
I think the last few comments are probably better captured as issues/discussion on the https://github.com/pkic/regions/ repository instead of here. Thanks!
Thanks for the bug report. Can you share the log output from the time period before you changed the `LogIndex` and restarted `ct-woodpecker`?
@ezekiel Thanks, that's perfect :+1: