cpresser

Hi and thanks for you contribution. I added a few screenshots here for reference. (**EDIT** Changed the first screenshot to be of variant C/D)    I took a...

> @cpresser Hello, thank you for comments! > But your picture show A & B mechanical options, this footprint for C & D as on picture below: You are right....

It is okay to use slotted holes here. The `_CircularHoles` variant will be a nice addition. @aris-kimi I just did assign you to this PR. If you would rather have...

> It seems that you removed the `SC-70-6` from tags and description. > And while you're at it, can you also add `SC-88` (this terminology seems to be used by...

Hi and thanks for you contribution. I did a quick check (no full review) and have a few questions: This is what I see in the data-sheet:   I...

There seems to be an eval board from micrel where I found this potato-quality top-copper-layout: http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/MIC33050-4YHL%20Evaluation%20Board%20User%20Guide.pdf  One can see that there are big copper islands that connect the pins...

@myfreescalewebpage I will take care of this PR. Regarding the name, I suggest to change it. Just 3 symbols need to be fixed: 

Hello @cederom thanks for you contribution. I added a screenshot - that really helps a lot to judge how much effort a review is. Thus, it helps to speed up...

Hi @chmorgan, Just un-assign your self. As soon as some other librarian finds the time and motivation they will start working on that.

I think we need to discuss the list of illegal symbols. ~~I think the dot `.` should be allowed, for example in `3.3V LDO` or `66.6MHz clock`~~ **edit:** I was...