Cornelius Schumacher

From https://github.com/dtr-org/unit-e-docs/issues/32#issuecomment-431292784: > PRs do not build release executables. This is a pitty, bitcoin for instance shipped 0.17 and the macos disk image was actually damaged as there was no...

What would be the benefit of a native Windows build? For a user it shouldn't make much of a difference, provided the build works, should it?

Ok, that makes sense. So it would be for CI, not for release builds, right?

Good points. This is one of the more challenging parts. @jberkus do you have examples in mind where a project is related to more than one organization? For the scope...

@jberkus How would the values for the Linux Kernel and PostgreSQL look like then? I'll add the templates for the two project. Let's see how we can fill them.

It looks like it would make most sense to separate the organization information from the project information. Having separate files and using references. There are the projects which have more...

I separated the info about organizations into separate files now. Types of relationships still have to be defined.

My hypothesis is that the maximum membership fee of an associated organization is an indicator for the type of project and its constituents. I usually find it interesting to look...

> * A theory of FLOSS projects and Open Source business > models dynamics: https://hal.science/hal-04963100v1/file/FLOSS_and_Open_source_business_models_JSS%20%283%29.pdf This is an interesting paper, because it takes the phase of the open source project...

Some context why we think a separate repo would be better: * We had people who didn't find the guide, because it's hidden in the hierarchy of the repo in...