Simon Schubert

I still don't get the complication. When looking at the `From:` header, I would insert a new line, `From: $envelope_from`, and then insert a `X-Original-From:\n\t`, and then insert the original...

Doing the whole rewriting is too complicated and will likely introduce bugs. I think we either replace the From: address, or not do it at all.

That is correct, we don't rewrite header lines. You probably should configure your smarthost not to reject mails originating from your machines/cron.

would you like to submit a PR for review? On 05/02/2020 18:03, Varac wrote: > > But what happens when delivering directly to an smtp server which is > not...

Not by me - happy to review and merge pull requests. On 12/02/2020 13:19, Varac wrote: > > @corecode Is there any chance to get > this fixed soon ?...

thanks! On 12/04/2021 07:46, Jernej Jakob wrote: > > I've added header From rewriting to dma. I'll open a PR. > > — > You are receiving this because you...

What's the status of this PR? Did we address all reviews?

I think we should use `strlcat` instead.

If we split some lines, I think we should split all lines. For simplicity's sake, I'd split them strictly at byte 990 or so...

We already do exponential backoff, with a minimum of 5 minutes. I don't see how this would make a machine sluggish. Are you trying to deliver several mails in parallel?