Clément Renaud
Clément Renaud
One solution may be to create temporary node but it is a mess.
depends on #11
hitting size limit here ``` |·---------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------·| | Solc version: 0.7.6 · Optimizer enabled: true · Runs: 80 │ |····························|································|·································| | Contract Name · Deployed size (KiB) (change) · Initcode size...
proper execution tested here https://sepolia.basescan.org/tx/0x67a7d66a265ae78e29a854266ef761d6660606d2cd60a260ce02cc10d0aa1c0a#eventlog
Also see this related issue about purchase arguments https://github.com/unlock-protocol/unlock/issues/13457
contract size audit here https://observablehq.com/d/fcfc7fa77ef2dd13
> Thanks! Also I think we should make it possible for the zero address to own more than the limit of token per address? Yep, addressed in [5f4de96](https://github.com/unlock-protocol/unlock/pull/14828/commits/5f4de96feb5b0b7631fbad03d904f841f2902a84) -- fix...
We also need to set the oracle for UP in Unlock within this proposal
> We also need to set the oracle for UP in Unlock within this proposal added in [87e1eb8](https://github.com/unlock-protocol/unlock/pull/14613/commits/87e1eb8902d284379fad1bdf262e9ecaf468f707)