CJ Yetman
CJ Yetman
PACTA team, in my interpretation, gave the green light for this in the meantime, though it still may be a debate/question in the future.
I believe it was "official" enough.
@jacobvjk is this still a valid issue?
this will probably be dealt with here 2DegreesInvesting/data_preparation/issues/14
yeah, I guess I was wondering if it's possible without that nuclear option, but in the long run that's probably what needs to happen
I don't even remember why this was a concern, but it does seem to still be happening, even though it was supposedly resolved according to https://github.com/2DegreesInvesting/PACTA_analysis/issues/17#issuecomment-611549921 @Clare2D is this a...
using current master 926d584eafd2d07c32017cf580dede5195775773 ```r library(dplyr) source("web_tool_script_1.R") file.path('working_dir/30_Processed_Inputs/TestPortfolio_Input/audit_file.rda') %>% readRDS() %>% as_tibble() %>% filter(asset_type %in% c('Bonds', 'Equity')) %>% filter(valid_input == FALSE) %>% select(investor_name, portfolio_name, holding_id, isin, value_usd, asset_type, valid_input, flag)...
I assume this is largely related to #368?
This is also relevant to the refactoring happening in #247