CL Fisher
CL Fisher
@elasticspoon Is this all moot if we are going with the simpler architecture as discussed (i.e. can this be closed, in your opinion?)
@elasticpoon If the resource is the invitee, rather than the inviter, the logic makes good sense. We send a different message to the primary partner id -- because they're the...
FWIW, what we have now passes my functional testing.
LGTM functionally. Over to @dorner for technical review.
Note: In a support request today, I see that PartnerRequest is referred to in the ItemRequest table.
Yes, you could! If you'd rather have something that will definitely include a code change, and get all the way through our process, you could try #4517 instead.
I guess that means we're not deleting it immediately! Though I'm not sure all those references to partner_request are to the partner_request table per se. You see, in production there...
Hey @Oce-ane -- are you still working on this?
Please do
Note: Apparently this PR does not include the user guide fixes. Therefore downgrading the "Fixes" to "Partial"