Chuigda Whitegive comments

Results 41 comments of


                                            Chuigda Whitegive

Need more rust

_Technically, Rust does not function good as some functional language. Lacking TCO and unlimited extent making it awkward to use certain functional tricks._ But I think I will give it...

Fix SIGABRT from WebRTC (#611)

Excuse me but, how much time does the CI usually take?

你需要**有效的提问**，单说没有makefile无法运行，没有人能知道是为什么，你需要给出 - 你是在什么平台上操作的（操作系统、CMake版本、终端环境、编译器） - 你的具体操作步骤（克隆/解压代码，在哪里CMake） - 你期望获得的结果 - 你实际得到的结果 - 操作过程中，出现了哪些诊断信息具体可以看[这篇文章](https://github.com/ryanhanwu/How-To-Ask-Questions-The-Smart-Way/blob/master/README-zh_CN.md) [这里](https://github.com/tikv/tikv/issues/4295)是一个比较好的报告问题的例子

pdf样式好，如何生成？

现在是 0202 年，根据我的经验，最简单的做法就是用浏览器打开mdbook的生成结果，在mdbook的页面上点击这个按钮 ![图片](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/29348140/91381675-8d16be00-e85a-11ea-98a4-919e4fc87bcf.png) 然后你会获得一个所有内容都在一页上的网页。接下来关掉左边侧边栏，然后用浏览器自带的打印工具打印即可。 ![图片](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/29348140/91381891-03b3bb80-e85b-11ea-8fe0-843b432f8e51.png)

翻译歧义

> 原文：If we were allowed to run this code, there’s a possibility the spawned thread would be immediately put in the background without running at all. > 翻译：假如这段代码可以运行，而新建线程则可能会立刻被转移到后台并完全没有机会运行。这个issue开了也快有两年了，我觉得这里翻译的主要问题来源于本句中的allowed缺少一个“执行者”，而被执行者“we”又是一个虚无缥缈的东西。个人认为这里可以把“执行者”的身份(编译器)补上，再意译一下，比如“如果编译器允许这段代码运行”

function 可以跟换为 “打xxxname牌”

谨防达拉崩巴打昆特牌

iOS build error，error: unknown warning option '-Wno-unused-but-set-variable'; did you mean '-Wno-unused-const-variable'? [-Werror,-Wunknown-warning-option]

(Though may be a bit late) I had similar issue when building Linux SDK (version 4.3). I resolved this by "hijacking" GCC: ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os, sys process =...

Example 22 segfaults

This should be the expected behaviour. In chapater 22 the descriptor set layout get specified in the pipeline, but with actually no descriptor set provided. Chapater 23 would fix this...

Chuigda Whitegive