Christoph Fröhlich

> the urdfs are different one is using a macro and the other doesn't. > > I tested both examples, the effort one is working and I can see the...

@ahcorde I made both URFDs equal now (inertia was not important for the position case).

> The position joints are working now, can we close this issue #240 ? What do you mean? I don't think that this behavior changed, at least not with this...

> Now it's moving: Passive joints were always "moving", but as if they were fixed in inertial frame. A movement of the parent link did not effect the respective joint....

I moved this issue to gazebo_ros2_control, because this is more a question of simulation than ros2_controllers. (I assumed you mean gazebo classic instead of gazebo? If not, I'll move it...

This is a drawback of the implementation with writing position or velocity values to the physics engine, see #240 for a similar issue. To overcome this, I'd suggest to write...

You mean float instead of double? Is float32 really supported by ros2? See the [docs here](https://docs.ros.org/en/rolling/Concepts/Basic/About-Parameters.html) or the definition [here](https://github.com/ros2/rcl_interfaces/blob/rolling/rcl_interfaces/msg/ParameterType.msg).

First time for me to run gdb on that stuff. It seems that `subset_of` is returning the correct string and added to the const string, which is then passed to...

I tried it with ros2_controllers (rolling and humble) installed from source, I have no binary installation at hand.

Why not updating it to the latest 24 version? Fyi: you could bump all hooks to the latest version by running `pre-commit autoupdate`. I also wrote a [reusable workflow](https://github.com/ros-controls/ros2_control_ci/blob/master/.github/workflows/reusable-update-pre-commit.yml) for...