Christopher Hertel

ha, wow, that seems to be a valid solution, nice 👍

yep, nice, works as well 👍 but next time when you want to mess around with an application, try references ;)

Well done @brzuchal!

Hey @brightbyte @mamuz, thanks for your work! i'd really love to see this change in master/next release. Any chance that could happen? how can i help with this?

i agree on excluding certain files or directories, but i'm not sure about a deprecation blacklist. I don't like the idea of extensive option usage like #17 provides as solution....

I would not agree on having public methods for "just in case..." and within this demo application it is not needed. And I usually try to avoid those nullable properties...

@javiereguiluz Totally get your point! :) Thanks for coming back to this!

I would argue that the search results should give info that helps a developer to choose if a package is worth investigating or not - the detail view will be...

True and more important for me while evaluation is the list and versions of dependencies, but that's definetly off scope for a list of results. Filtering for compatibility with specific...

Implemented & merged with #1721 for v2.11