Connor Horman

Update: * Limited Progress has been made since last update. The syntax discussion has been opened, but has seen limited progress.. It may be good for that to move to...

Progress Updates: * Currently limited progress has been made. Syntax and stdlib types discussion are open in the same place as last update.

Progress Update: * Since the last update, implementation work has begun (though limited progress has been made on that). It will initially use the "no syntax" option, and the work...

I had a few plans for basic RTMP with a similar project, tunneling through WebSocket. Ideally both projects would be compatible on the network side, so the WebSocket Tunnel could...

Also, don't know whether I need to do this now, but rustc-dev-guide apparently wants this for new `rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable` uses, so CC: @rust-lang/wg-const-eval.

I will take care of this research. T-lang should probably at least have some eyes on it, since the directive list was effectively stabilized. Procedurally, should this have the S-waiting-on-reviewer...

https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2024 I checked something and this might be a bit trickerier. According to [expr.move.movable-place], `x.0` is not a movable place (which is correct). However, it can be dereferenced mutably (which...

@rustbot author

The Itanium C++ ABI is the abi used by gcc and clang on most non-windows targets. The ABI was standardized for IA-64, hense the name, but the spec is used...

> Basically, I am objecting to including anything like 2-phase-unwind into the opsem of Rust. 2-phase-unwind is an implementation detail, I don't see good reason why it should be in...