Connor Horman

Note that EM_65816 (257) is a registered with generic-abi, (See the conversation here: https://groups.google.com/g/generic-abi/c/qaPzp2lRzDA, also note inclusion in upstream GNU Binutils: https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/blob/14a6b9b4b68c33f1182c8e6060dcb25514268af9/include/elf/common.h#L354). While changing the relocations to match those of...

> Connor, do you have that link? If you are referring to the ABI Working Document, I linked it above.

Returning the discussion of 65816 vs. 6502 elf machine number from #86 (which primarily references the fact that EM_MCS6502 already existed and was registered with the maintainers of the ELF...

Note that the above document is obsolete, and changed locations roughly a month ago. It is now in the SNES-Dev Project's github organization and repository, https://github.com/SNES-Dev/SNES-Dev/blob/main/docs/abi/v1.md. It has also been...

That is fair. We will get the gcc backend working and return then.

Note: if files using the old number do in fact already exist, then it would be reasonable to maintain the old value for legacy purposes, but new files should use...

The existing registration is EM_65816 (257), and also recognized in upstream binutils (I previously mentioned this on #32).

I certainly kept one thread for asking questions, so I’d assume there’s no problem with that On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 21:21 Cornelia Xaos wrote: > Thanks for the...

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 21:22 Tin Švagelj wrote: > I know some of these might end up being very expensive. Sadly, Mojang is > doing a $#!t job...

Baking the list also breaks with modded uses, for which I would actually make use of frequently. I would not recommend baking the ids of items/blocks/entities, as I mentioned, except...