cholly75

Incorporated new feedback from Court upon seeing design; waiting for clarification on whether question (3) is necessary from the Rules committee.

@ttlenard - once you've looked at this, let's make sure we get IRS testing from their side as well.

@alexdziarn @ttlenard @Evelyn-Durbin Judge Feedback: - [x] Validation message: Change the text "You are the only counsel representing your party on this case." TO "You are the only counsel representing...

@alexdziarn @ttlenard @Evelyn-Durbin Also note there is a change to feedback previously requested in [this comment](https://github.com/ustaxcourt/ef-cms/issues/8994#issuecomment-3861636606). The text requested should now read: - [x] When there is a party with...

@AnthonyLoeraTaxCourt - found a discrepancy on the dashboard view; the Clerk value on the trial session is not populated on the trial session row on the dashboard. This is only...

[consolidation_cover_sheet_proposal.docx](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/18352972/consolidation_cover_sheet_proposal.docx)

@zacharybrown204 @JayFlexy @ttlenard - additional ask to the story: we would like the Order disposing of the motion to _also_ have its docket entry edited when serving, indicating which motions...

Document hyperlink visibility rules: External (non-logged in) users: should have visibility into non-"sealed to public" Orders/Court-issued documents on the docket record Logged in parties (petitioner and practitioner) to a case...

@zacharybrown204 @ttlenard Changes requested from feedback: - [ ] A) Change phrasing on checkbox to "This order is dispositive for at least one motion" - [ ] B) On the...

@codyseibert - no further changes needed, keep the consolidation as is currently implemented in the story.