Shing Wan Choi

Use --no-regress That will generate the PRS without needing the phenotypes. Problem is that you won't know what is the best threshold for prediction. You'll need a phenotype to optimize...

Nope, not at the moment. You can submit a sample file as an external fam though. E.g. --target XXX,yyy.sample --no-regress Sam On Mon, Mar 21, 2022, 5:34 PM Matthew Cloward...

Mind checking the latest version? On Thu, Jun 9, 2022, 9:07 AM MaleehaMaria ***@***.***> wrote: > Assigned #296 to > @choishingwan . > > — > Reply to this email...

Unfortunately, not at the moment. I've left academic and don't have the bandwidth for this. Though you might be able to take advantage of the print-snps option which print the...

Difficult to tell without the full context, but does not seems like there is anything out of the ordinary.

Hi, that's because your x-range command contains comma which was interpreted as a file input instead of range (see that the missing file name is 510). Remove the comma from...

You can use `--no-regress --no-full --bar-levels XXX --fastscore` where XXX is the best threshold you found via your CV

Which version of PRSice are you using? And those result doesn’t look like what we’ve got in the tutorial On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 4:57 AM, ooozcl ***@***.***> wrote:...

Without looking at the data, it's difficult to tell. First thing I'll check is to see if the number of post clump snp is the same, then I'd check the...

We've not perform any research on that actually. But I'd imagine using a GWAS on her effect will be the best, though using the additive one should not be too...