Claus Höfele

Sorry, no. Shouldn‘t be hard to convert, but I‘m not sure the techniques used in this library are still the best way to achieve the link handling

Thanks for your PR. Could you please send me some step-by-step instructions how to reproduce the problem your are fixing with the sample app? I'd like to verify the solution...

Also: your code causes the unit tests to fail because you changed the method parameters.

There are two changes in this PR: 1. The algorithm to figure out if a zoom has occurred now uses the zoom level 2. `updateAnnotationsWithCompletionHandler` is only called if the...

You are right - this type of animation is not currently supported with the existing interfaces. I definitely want to have this in future, though. Pull request? ;-)

Thanks a lot for your work — I'll have a look in the next few days

I haven't finished reviewing the code yet, but have you had a look at [this library](https://github.com/MarcoSero/MSMapClustering/blob/master/MSMapClustering/MSMapClusteringDelegate.m#L156)? It seems to get by without using associated objects. Also, is there a way...

Unit tests: while I don't think we can test the animation itself, we can create tests to ensure that annotations are at the right place afterwards. So I need two...

I think the animations are based on the `MKAnnotation`s added to the map and these are all of type `CCHMapClusterAnnotation`. I'm not against associated objects per se, but if a...

Events outside links are ignored so that when you tap on the text view, a table will register it as a row selection. I'm not sure wether both scrolling and...