Cezar Moise
Cezar Moise
@fruch should this be closed due to https://github.com/scylladb/scylla-ccm/pull/558?
maybe the readme needs to be updated as well https://github.com/scylladb/scylla-ccm/blob/076a4068c879da661cdda5df0e623a211e5b7282/README.md?plain=1#L59
# Results https://argus.scylladb.com/tests/scylla-cluster-tests/a22d7bbd-4e14-4a94-b9ef-c6460a50b465 Run date: 2025-03-02 Scylla version: 2025.2.0~dev-20250301.0343235aa269 Initial cluster: 3 racks with one i4i.2xlarge per rack Write to 90%, RF=3, initial tablets=1024 Drop a big table  Older...
Updated https://github.com/scylladb/scylla-cluster-tests/issues/9166#issuecomment-2477207563 with better graph.
Updated results with run at 70% workload
Added run with latest 2025.1
Updated with run with 3 racks and initial tablets.
cc @tgrabiec @nuivall
I understand that the logs refer to the cluster, which was originally a i4i.large cluster, but there is no mention of the added node's instance type anywhere.
> It's something with your env. I don't know yet what. Do you have any changes in `/home/cezar/Documents/github/cezarmoise/scylla-cluster-tests` ? No changes. It also fails if resources are there to be...