Andrea Marco Sartori

Hi @halaxa, no worries :) Do you plan to rewrite the parser before tackling this PR or you are thinking of rewriting it at a later stage?

No worries at all, take your time :) I renamed the variables as you suggested, I guess the issue with the build is related to the conflict between the versions...

Also there are 2 questions I'd like to ask you: 1. why are we multiplying the salted integer by `0x9e3b` in `transform()`? 2. we are keeping only the first 6...

I ended up with this solution: https://gist.github.com/cerbero90/fb99f79570c413a05c5efa5aab6dd72e it supports 32bit and 64bit integers but does not support negative integers, feedback is more than welcome :) Regarding the question 2, base64...

I think it would be fantastic a mix of the options 1 and 3: for each **different** selection ask which class should be expanded and expand all the same occurrences....

It would be good if this could come true :)

Please add this library to Packagist

Thanks for finding the time to review and merge the PR! Do you reckon this fix can be tagged as `1.1.3`? :)

Hey @halaxa, I was looking into a very similar solution a couple of days ago. Great timing! I'd say that what we are leveraging here are technically nested iterators, so...

Hi @michabbb, it is not possible at the moment but it shouldn't be too hard to add it to the package. If you can describe how the API you are...