Celestial Phineas

Results 24 comments of Celestial Phineas

Well, if you wouldn't mind, you can [build one yourself](https://github.com/welai/glow-sans/blob/master/docs/build-instructions.md). Glow Sans' weight configuration is a compromise to matching the weights of Fira Sans and Raleway as well as not...

原本倒是有計劃將熒黑的假名替換成M+,甚至有個製作中的M+可變假名字體: https://github.com/welai/MplusVKana 但至於補齊M+漢字,並沒有相關想法。而且現在思源黑體出可變版本了,也用不上像熒黑這樣費這麼大勁了。

其实思源黑体的半宽片假名不是机械压缩的,他们做了修正的。 ![SHSansJ-halfwidth-kana](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17267055/79679260-ec264f80-8236-11ea-9df4-22eff8754872.png)

目前荧黑的算法在假名上表现不佳。思源黑体的假名带喇叭口,压缩的时候比较容易出问题。下一版本可能考虑换成M+的假名。 荧黑的半宽假名着实偷懒了,只是通过改字间距实现压缩。如果精力允许的话下一版会有所改进。 ![GlowSans-kana](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17267055/79679347-e4b37600-8237-11ea-9afd-4417d384bf7d.png)

Given the computational nature of Glow Sans, manual glyph fixes are not under consideration, and it is a shame that, font build for Glow Sans has ignored the original CID...

Full v2.001 CID correspondence for a classical orthography is certainly welcomed. I would appreciate it if someone would have such data.

#2 #10 #28 去脚bug。理论上切到思源黑可变版可规避这些问题,但是也意味着代码大规模重写。作者现在在忙别的项目。

This is a known issue, probably a problem with stroke width estimation. The feet removal algorithm fails when meeting extreme parameters. Perhaps this will not be fixed, since the extreme...

At least feet removal works well for **Glow Sans Thin Compressed (180)**: * [GitHub Demo Link](https://welai.github.io/glow-sans/#fontsize=100&width=0.8&weight=0.82&contrast=1&xtracking=0.97&ytracking=1&counter=1.03&gravity=1.04&softness=0.98&dotsoftness=0.25&feetremoval=true&endsremoval=true&flattenends=0.75&hooktension=0.4&baseline=120&latinscale=1.07&shs=0&fira=14&hstroke=21.648000000000003&vstroke=21.648000000000003) * [Gitee Demo Link](https://celestialphineas.gitee.io/glow-sans/#fontsize=100&width=0.8&weight=0.82&contrast=1&xtracking=0.97&ytracking=1&counter=1.03&gravity=1.04&softness=0.98&dotsoftness=0.25&feetremoval=true&endsremoval=true&flattenends=0.75&hooktension=0.4&baseline=120&latinscale=1.07&shs=0&fira=14&hstroke=21.648000000000003&vstroke=21.648000000000003) You may check out if your contrast setting is too...

> > Demo Link > > 也是去脚问题: > 目前`中国`这样口居中的字去脚效果可以,左右结构里口偏上的`明湖`看起来也可以,但遇到口垫底的字排版起来效果就……显得相对同一行的其它字飘起来了。这一类字Demo里没有希望添加:名容兽音(整体飘起)飴(右边飞升)我暂时只测试出这几字,怀疑是普遍现象。 > > 可以用“包括作者姓名与内容特征”这句测试,可以发现“名容”浮起一点。 目前已经下降1/4脚高作为补偿了,做到完美是很难的。