Cedoor
Thanks @ChinoCribioli and @artwyman! > Perhaps @cedoor is willing to do so, or can suggest someone to double-check here. I'm also not competent enough to check the logic out here....
> However, I think that any implementation of a rather complex cryptographic protocol must have a strong focus on security and, as you said, the performant variant may not be...
> One solution might be to release a new major if the security benefits are substantial and continue to maintain version 1 anyway. @chancehudson @artwyman any thoughts?
Hey @NathaliaBarreiros are you still working on this?
Hey @timou0911, this issue depends on #343, which has a related PR (#364) that needs to be closed. I pinged the author to find out if they can work on...
Hi @Chirag-S-Kotian, this issue still depends on #343, which has not been completed yet.